Conflicts in Family-school Partnership:Functions,Causes and Solutions

Abstract

Abstract:

Home-school conflict is a common phenomenon in the process of home-school cooperation, which can provide us with an opportunity to reflect on and improve home-school cooperation. The causes of home-school conflicts are diverse and cannot be generalized: there are conflicts of interest, conflicts of power, conflicts of role expectations and perceptions, and conflicts of communication. Countermeasures include: correcting biased ideas and adopting differentiated ways to deal with home-school conflicts; establishing a sound legal system to balance teachers’ professional autonomy and parents’ right to participate in education; improving the quality of home-school communication and rebuilding the relationship of trust between teachers and parents; Improve teacher education and parent education, and carry out home-school communication training and guidance.

Key words: family-school conflict, family-school partnership, parent-teacher relationship, basic education, family education

CLC Number:

G459

Rao Shuqi. Conflicts in Family-school Partnership:Functions,Causes and Solutions[J]. Education Science, 2022, 38(6): 21-27.

References 34

[1]	B.A.苏霍姆林斯基. 给教师的建议(修订本)[M].杜殿坤,编译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2006:539-540.
[2]	吴康宁. 教育改革成功的基础[J]. 教育研究, 2012(1):24-31.
[3]	OLIVOS E M. Community and school collaborations: tapping into community organizing initiatives and resources[M]//SHELDON S B, TURNER-VORBECK T A. The Wiley handbook of family, school, and community relationships in education. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019:9-27.
[4]	ALBRIGHT M I, WEISSBERG R P. School-family partnerships to promote social and emotional learning[M]//CHRISTENSON S L, RESCHLY A. Handbook of school-family partnerships. NY: Routledge, 2010:346-265.
[5]	邓林园, 许睿, 赵鑫钰, 等. 中国高中阶段家校合作的现状以及与高中生发展的关系[J]. 教育学报, 2016,(6):78-87.
[6]	BERCOVITCH J, KREMENYUK V, ZARTMAN I W. Introduction: the nature of conflict and conflict resolution[M]//BERCOVITCH J, KREMENYUK V, ZARTMAN I W. The Sage handbook of conflict resolution. London: Sage, 2009:3.
[7]	盖奥尔格·西美尔. 社会学:关于社会化形式的研究[M].林荣远,译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002:179.
[8]	巴赫金. 陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题[M]. 白春仁,顾亚铃,译. 北京: 三联书店, 1992:344.
[9]	科塞. 社会冲突的功能[M].孙立平,等译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1989:72.
[10]	COSER L A. The functions of social conflict[M]. New York: Routledge, 1956:8.
[11]	COSER L A. The functions of social conflict[M]. New York: Routledge, 1956:8.
[12]	安东尼·吉登斯, 菲利普·萨顿. 社会学基本概念[M].王修晓,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021:279.
[13]	高德胜. 家庭作业的伦理审视[J]. 教育发展研究, 2021(18):11-22.
[14]	王瑞德. 学校中的教师冲突研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2014:30.
[15]	张越, 曹全友, 徐春雷, 等. 家校合作研究的分层、路径及整合:基于“意识三态观”的分析架构[J]. 民族教育研究, 2021(1):136-143.
[16]	KIM E M, SHERIDAN S M. Foundational aspects of family-school connections: definitions, conceptual frameworks, and research needs[M]//SHERIDAN S M, KIM E M. Founda-tional aspects of family-school partnership research. New York: Springer, 2015: 1-11.
[17]	WALLER W. The sociology of teaching[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1932:68.
[18]	CHRISTENSON S L. The family-school partnership: an opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students[J]. School psychology review, 2004, 33(1):83-104. doi: 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086233
[19]	马健生, 李洋. 为每个学生提供适合的教育:何以可能或何以不可能[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(6):22-31.
[20]	何菊玲. 因材施教原则的教育正义之意韵[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018(2):110-116.
[21]	AUERBACH S. School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships[M]. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012:29-51.
[22]	中华人民共和国教师法. [EB/OL].(2022-09-04)[1993-10-31].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_zcfg/zcfg_jyfl/tnull_1314.html.
[23]	尹弘飙, 操太圣. 课程改革中教师的身份认同:制度变迁与自我重构[J]. 教育发展研究, 2008(2):35-40.
[24]	VINCENT C, TOMLINSON S. Home-school relationships: the swarming of disciplinary mechanisms?[J]. British educational research journal, 1997, 23(3):361-377. doi: 10.1080/0141192970230308
[25]	DUSI P. The family-school relationships in Europe: a research review[J]. CEPS journal, 2012, 2(1):13-33.
[26]	黄河清, 马恒懿. 家校合作价值论新探[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2011(12):23-29.
[27]	孙廷华. 对“社会角色”的哲学思考[J]. 社会科学, 1991(4):44-47.
[28]	吴河江. 学校信任:内涵、功能与增进策略[J]. 教育学报, 2019(12):40-45.
[29]	闫光才. 教师“身份”的制度与文化根源及当下危机[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(4):12-17.
[30]	KEYES C R. Parent-teacher partnerships: a theoretical approach for teachers[C]// Issues in early childhood education: curriculum, teacher education & dissemination of information. Champaign, IL: Symposium Conducted at the Lilian Katz Symposium, 2000:107-118.
[31]	鞠佳雯, 李妍, 蒋柳青. 促进家长参与家校合作的国际经验及启示[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(5):33-38.
[32]	KEYES C R. Parent-teacher partnerships: a theoretical approach for teachers[C]// Issues in early childhood education: curriculum, teacher education & dissemination of information. Champaign, IL: Symposium Conducted at the Lilian Katz Symposium, 2000:107-118.
[33]	柴江. 家校合作的本质属性、困境根源与破解思路[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2021(3):62-72.
[34]	KEYES C R. Parent-teacher partnerships: a theoretical approach for teachers[C]// Issues in early childhood education: curriculum, teacher education & dissemination of information. Champaign, IL: Symposium Conducted at the Lilian Katz Symposium, 2000:107-118.