The Connotation, Elements and Promotion Strategies of the Leadership of the District and County Teaching and Research Staff

Abstract

Abstract:

There is an increasing emphasis on empowering teachers around the world,highlighting the development of teacher leadership. District and county teaching and research staff are important guides for teachers’professional growth,and research on their leadership has become a new topic in the team construction of teaching and research staff in the new era. Based on the system theory and transformational leadership theory,from the perspective of academic logic,historical logic and practical logic,this paper analyzes and defines the connotation,elements and dimensions of leadership and the leadership of district and county teaching and research staff. The leadership of the district and county teaching and research staff includes general leadership at the basic level and professional leadership at the expanded level. General leadership refers to the capabilities in thought leading,strategic planning,communication,teamwork,resource planning,organizational change,and community building that are necessary for district and county teaching and research staff to demonstrate the value of organizational leadership. Professional leadership refers to the teaching and research staff in districts and counties,leading and cooperating with stakeholders,in order to continue to realize the common vision of teaching and research,and thus need to have educational decision-making consulting ability,curriculum reform promotion ability,teaching practice guidance ability,academic quality evaluation ability,Teachers develop promotional abilities and special research action abilities. The improvement of the leadership of district and county teaching and research staff can be achieved by reshaping the leadership culture of district and county teaching and research personnel,deepening the special training of teaching and research personnel leadership,accelerating the construction of regional teaching and research communities,and improving the platform mechanism for empowering teaching and research.

Key words: leadership of teaching and research staff, connotation, elements, general leadership, professional leadership, promotion strategy

CLC Number:

G40-03

Song Naiqing, Wu Lele. The Connotation, Elements and Promotion Strategies of the Leadership of the District and County Teaching and Research Staff[J]. Education Science, 2023, 39(3): 8-14.

References 33

[1]	英国培生教育出版亚洲有限公司. 朗文当代高级英语辞典:英英·英汉双解[M].第五版. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2014:1423.
[2]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M].第六版. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012:827、796、656.
[3]	王娟. 中小学校长领导力评价指标体系研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2016.
[4]	苗建明, 霍国庆, 孟建平. 领导力五力模型研究[J]. 领导科学, 2006(9):20-23.
[5]	刘义兵, 付光槐. 教师教育一体化发展的体制机制创新[J]. 教育研究, 2014(1):111-116.
[6]	[9] 詹姆斯·M. 库泽斯, 巴巴里·Z. 波斯纳. 领导力:如何在组织中成就卓越[M]. 第6版.徐中,沈小滨,译. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2018.
[7]	王庆燕, 魏江茹. X+领导力组合及其发展趋势预判[J]. 领导科学, 2022(4):70-72.
[8]	蔡礼强. 中国共产党领导力研究的理论视角和分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8):1-11.
[10]	程介明. 教研:中国教育的宝藏[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5):1-11.
[11]	刘月霞. 追根溯源:“教研”源于中国本土实践[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021(5):85-98.
[12]	新华网. 教育部首次明确教研员标准[EB/OL].(2019-11-30)[2022-04-30]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2019/51594/mtbd/201912/t20191203_410645.html.
[13]	宋乃庆, 杨黎, 范涌峰. 新时代教育现代化:内涵、意义及表现形式[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(1):1-8.
[14]	杨九诠. 中国教研体系的定位与定性[J]. 教育发展研究, 2022, 42(8):10-20.
[15]	田慧生. 向“大教研”转型[J]. 人民教育, 2016(20):14-19.
[16]	崔允漷. 论教研室的定位与教研员的专业发展[J]. 上海教育科研, 2009(8):4-8.
[17]	王艳玲, 胡惠闵. 我国教研机构的类型与职能:基于全国抽样调查的分析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020, 40(增刊2):23-31.
[18]	魏易, 罗滨, 林秀艳, 等. 区域教研对学生学业成绩影响的实证研究:以北京市海淀区为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5):12-54.
[19]	吴颖民. 国外对中小学教师领导力问题的研究与启示[J]. 比较教育研究, 2008(8):52-57.
[20]	YORK-BARR J, DUKE K. What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship[J]. Review of educational research, 2004, 74(3):255-316. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003255
[21]	阿尔玛·哈里斯, 丹尼尔·缪伊斯. 教师领导力与学校发展[M].许联,吴合文,译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2007:103.
[22]	刘保兄, 刘小娟. 教师成为领导者:美国新教师发展观述评[J]. 全球教育展望 2007(6):30-34.
[23]	Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. Teacher leader model standards[EB/OL]. [2022-06-05]. https://www.nnstoy.org/teacher-leader-model-standards/.
[24]	孙杰. 教师领导力的三维模型设计:构念形成、内涵特征与模型构建[J]. 教育学报, 2021, 17(6):122-133.
[25]	周丽丽, 彼得·麦克拉伦. 英国新一轮中小学教师发展领导力框架改革探析[J]. 比较教育学报, 2021(5):118-131.
[26]	任朝旺. 论中国共产党的战略领导力[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2022(1):1-7.
[27]	董洪亮. 基于证据的教研转向:基本概念问题的初步讨论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021(5):108-115.
[28]	吴乐乐, 徐辉. 深化高中学校考试招生制度改革的路径分析[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2018, 38(5):111-115.
[29]	宋乃庆, 肖林, 郑智勇. 新中国成立以来我国中小学校长培训发展:回眸与展望[J]. 中国电化教育, 2020(1):33-39.
[30]	沈伟, 孙天慈. 中国教研员研究的历史脉络与多重视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021(5):116-129.
[31]	张岱年, 方克立. 中国文化概论[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2004:3-5.
[32]	徐辉, 吴乐乐. 基础教育教研工作转型发展的路径思考[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2017(1):101-107.
[33]	李明, 毛军权. 领导力研究的理论评述[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2015(6):91-102.