The Choice, Path and Enlightenment of American Educational Soft Power

Abstract

Abstract:

The establishment and maintenance of American hegemony in today’s world depends not only on the strong military and economic hard power, but also on the reform and implementation of educational soft power. Based on the value of the times, the endogenous dynamics and the cultural strategy, the United States regards the development of education as the focus of the promotion of soft power. Shaping the cultural values at home by patriotic education, constructing comprehensive education development strategy and promoting deep integration of Education Internationalization abroad have realized the Promotion of American soft power. The implementation path of American educational soft power enlightens our country in the process of promoting soft power.Therefore, we should pay attention to passing on national traditional culture, the reform and innovation of National top-level design, the precise investment of talent training funds and the diversification and integration of education internationalization.

Key words: educational soft power, the United States, patriotic education, educational development strategy, educational internationalization

CLC Number:

G53.712.2

Xiao Fengxiang, Zhang Rong. The Choice, Path and Enlightenment of American Educational Soft Power[J]. Education Science, 2020, 36(3): 70-75.

References 29

[1]	[美] 汉斯·摩根索. 国家间的政治——寻求权力与和平的斗争[M].徐昕,郝望,李保平,译. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 1990: 115.
[2] [8] [20]	Joseph S, Nye Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics[M]. New York:Public Affairs, 2004: 5-112.
[3]	Zhou Jinghao. Does China’s Rise Threaten the United States?[J]. Asian Perspective, 2008,3(32):171-182.
[4]	宁国栋. 文化软实力建构背景下美国思想政治教育研究[D]. 武汉:湖北大学, 2016: 63.
[5]	Henry Kissinger. Years of Upheaval[M]. Boston:Little Brown Company, 1982: 242.
[6]	Joseph S, Nye. Jr. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power[M]. New York: Now York Basic Books, 1990: 4-30.
[7]	王晓德. 美国文化与外交[M]. 北京: 世界知识出版社, 2000: 220.
[9]	张少雄. 民族国家高等教育系统的应然使命[J]. 现代大学教育, 2010(2):1-8.
[10]	胡弼成, 陈小伟. 作为第一防线:美国教育文化软实力建设战略及其启示[J]. 现代大学教育, 2010(5):13-17.
[11]	Edward M. Bums. The American Idea of Mission. Concepts of National Purpose and Destiny[J]. Washington: Rutgers University Press, 1957(2):30.
[12]	李旭东. 论思维方式对冷战后对中美对外战略的影响[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2009(6):15-21.
[13]	Frederick Edwards. The Religious Character ofAmerican Patriotism[J]. The Humanist Magazine, 1982(6):21-25.
[14]	Stageof Life: Statistics about Teens and Mental Illness[EB/OL].(2014-05-11)[2019-11-06]. http://www.stageoflife.com/StageHighSchool/OtherResources/Statistics_on_High_School_Students_and_Teenagers.aspx.
[15]	岳西宽. 美国高喊衰落的几个历史瞬间[N]. 环球时报, 2011-07-12(2).
[16]	U.S. Department of Education. Strategic Plan 2002-2007[R]. Washington, D.C:March, 2002: 9.
[17]	U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Secretary. Answering the Challenge of a Changing World: Strengthening Education for the 21^st Century[R]. Washington, D.C:April, 2006: 6.
[18]	刘军伟. 美国世界一流大学的发展历程及经验启示[J]. 中国高教研究, 2019(10):47-52.
[19]	Powell. Statement on International[N]. Education Week, 2001-07-23(3).
[21]	中共中央宣传部. 习近平总书记系列重要讲话读本[M]. 北京: 学习出版社, 2014: 102.
[22]	胡弼成, 上官晴. 教育文化软实力的构成及内部效应探究[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2010(3):29-35.
[23]	[美] S.E.佛洛斯特. 西方教育的历史和哲学基础[M].吴元训,等译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1987: 10.
[24]	余凯, David Martin Osher. 基于标准的美国基础教育改革的问题和政策启示[J]. 教育科学, 2013(6):89-96.
[25]	John H. Walker. American Education: Foundations and Policy[M]. SaoPaulo: West Publishing Corporation, 1989: 92.
[26]	孙辉. 美国创新型国家的基本特征和主要优势[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2006(8):15-24.
[27]	谢颖. 与王辉耀对话《人才战争》[N]. 中国政协报, 2009-08-09(A02).
[28]	[法] 路易·多格若. 国际文化关系[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1987: 27.
[29]	杨启光. 教育国际化进程与发展模式[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2011: 241.