教育科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 38-46.

• 教育基本理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

比较与融合:高师院校通识教育改革的创新理路*

柳欣源1, 满莹2   

  1. 1.华东师范大学 教育部中学校长培训中心,上海 200062
    2.东北师范大学 教育学部,吉林 长春 130024
  • 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 满莹
  • 作者简介:柳欣源(1984- ),女,吉林长春人,华东师范大学教育部中学校长培训中心助理研究员,博士,主要从事教育管理、教育改革与教育政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    *国家社会科学基金项目“十三五”规划2019年度教育学重大课题“新时代中国教育高质量发展的路径和对策研究”(VFA190004)

Comparison and Integration:Innovative Approaches to the Reform of General Education in Normal Universities

Liu Xinyuan1, Man Ying2   

  1. 1. National Training Center for Secondary School Principals,Ministry of Education,Shanghai 200062,China
    2. Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun Jilin 130024,China
  • Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-12-31
  • Contact: Man Ying

摘要:

高师院校通识教育的时代内涵在于贯通古今、融通中外、汇通各域;奠定博识、积累卓识、拓展见识。国内外不同类型高校的通识教育在基本理念、培养目标、组织模式、课程模块、管理机制、修读要求等维度具有一定的趋同性与差异性,为高师院校通识教育改革提供了重要参考。研究发现,高师院校通识教育存在观念模糊,培养目标定位同质化;课程组织模式缺乏特色,管理制度欠缺保障;课程结构与学分设置失衡,师资力量相对薄弱等实践困境。对此,有必要结合高师院校学校性质和高质量教育体系建设需要,确立科学的通识教育理念与课程目标,构建系统的课程组织模式,建立教学管理与保障制度,优化通识教育课程制度与师资建设,以适应基础教育对高素质师资的时代需求。

关键词: 高师院校, 通识教育, 时代内涵, 多维比较, 创新理路

Abstract:

The contemporary implications of general education in normal universities lie in bridging ancient and modern knowledge, integrating Chinese and foreign perspectives, and uniting various domains; it aims to establish broad knowledge, accumulate profound insights, and expand horizons. General education in different types of universities both domestically and internationally exhibits certain similarities and differences in dimensions such as basic philosophy, educational objectives, organizational models, course modules, management mechanisms, and study requirements, providing important references for the reform of general education in normal universities. Research has found that general education in normal universities faces practical challenges, including unclear concepts, homogenization in educational objective positioning, lack of distinctive course organization models, inadequate management systems, imbalanced course structures, and credit settings, and relatively weak faculty strength. In response, it is necessary to align with the nature of normal universities and the requirements for building a high-quality education system, to establish scientific general education concepts and course objectives, to construct systematic course organization models, to establish teaching management and support systems, and to optimize the general education course system and faculty development to meet the contemporary demand for high-quality teachers in basic education.

Key words: normal universities, general education, contemporary implications, multidimensional comparison, innovative approaches

中图分类号: