当代教育科学自然主义转向的缘起逻辑、生发范畴与价值意蕴*——基于方法论的视角

教育科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 37-43.

当代教育科学自然主义转向的缘起逻辑、生发范畴与价值意蕴^*——基于方法论的视角

张妍

宁波大学教育管理与政策研究中心,浙江宁波 315210

出版日期:2024-09-15 发布日期:2024-11-01
作者简介:张妍(1983- ),女,山东临清人,宁波大学教育管理与政策研究中心讲师,主要从事教育政策研究。
基金资助:
* 教育部人文社科基金2022年度青年项目“我国终身学习国际话语权的理论构建与提升策略研究”(22YJC880113)

The Origin Logic,Generative Category and Value Implication of the Naturalism Turn of Contemporary Educational Science —Based on the Methodological Perspective

Zhang Yan

Center for Education Management and Policy Research,Ningbo University,Ningbo Zhejiang 315210,China

Online:2024-09-15 Published:2024-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当代教育科学自然主义转向的缘起在于,多种类的自然科学方法在科研领域的广泛运用对人文科学产生的积极影响、多样化的定量分析为教育科学自然主义转向提供的工具支撑、多元化的大数据为教育科学自然主义转向提供的技术支持等三个方面。这种转向推动了教育科学在哲学问题求解模式上的变革,促进了对教育科学知识科学性的辩护,强化了教育科学与认知科学的不断融合。然而,人类的教育思维模式与教育行为实践是一个复杂的动态系统,自然主义方法依然具有一定限度,在具体运用过程中,我们应注意不能忽略相关变量在客观性与主观性之间的平衡问题、理论建构与方法驱动之间的张力问题以及不确定性与风险性之间的控制问题。未来的教育科学需要建构从思辨到逻辑、从经验到理论、从观察到实验的一整套的系统论证方法,真正夯实自身的“科学”地位。

关键词: 教育科学, 自然主义, 方法论

Abstract:

The origin of the naturalistic turn in contemporary educational science lies in the positive impact of the wide application of various natural science methods in the field of scientific research on the humanities, the tool support provided by diversified quantitative analysis for the turn of naturalism in educational science,and the technical support provided by diversified big data for the turn of naturalism in educational science. This turn has promoted the transformation of educational science in the mode of solving philosophical problems, promoted the defense of the scientific nature of educational science knowledge, and strengthened the continuous integration of educational science and cognitive science. However, human educational thinking patterns and educational behavior practices are a complex dynamic system, and the naturalistic method still has certain limitations. In the specific application process, attention should be paid to the balance between objectivity and subjectivity of relevant variables,the tension between theoretical construction and method drive,and the control between uncertainty and risk. The future educational science needs to construct a whole set of systematic argumentation methods from speculation to logic, from experience to theory, and from observation to experiment,so as to truly consolidate its “scientific” status.

Key words: educational science, naturalism, methodology

中图分类号:

G649

张妍. 当代教育科学自然主义转向的缘起逻辑、生发范畴与价值意蕴^*——基于方法论的视角[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(5): 37-43.

Zhang Yan. The Origin Logic,Generative Category and Value Implication of the Naturalism Turn of Contemporary Educational Science —Based on the Methodological Perspective[J]. Education Science, 2024, 40(5): 37-43.

参考文献 20

[1]	CALLEBAUT W. Taking the naturalistic turn[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993:xv.
[2]	GALPARSORO J I. Reflections on naturalism[M]. Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2019:130.
[3]	COHEN J I. Correction to: incorporating lessons from women naturalists to support biodiversity education and under-represented students[J]. SN social sciences, 2023(8):21-32.
[4]	华勒斯坦. 开放社会科学[M].刘锋,译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1997:96-97.
[5]	LITTLE D. Varieties of social explanation: an introduction to the philosophy of social science[M]. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991:225-226.
[6]	PSILLOS S. Philosophy of science A-Z[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007:158.
[7]	QUINE W V. Ontological relativity & other essays[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969:26.
[8]	WRIGHT J. International encyclopedia of the social science[J]. Oxford elsevier, 2021(16):325-333.
[9]	NEWTON-SMITH W. A companion to the philosophy of science[M]. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2000:309.
[10]	欧阳康, 张明仓. 社会科学研究方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001:80.
[11]	王晓森, 殷杰. 社会科学的自然主义进路何以可能:兼论塞尔的解决方案[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2016(5):56-61.
[12]	MILL J. A system of logic[M]. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1856:xii.
[13]	HARTWIG M. Dictionary of critical realism[M]. London:Routledge, 2007:254.
[14]	WARF B. The spatial turn:interdisciplinary perspectives[M]. New York: Routledge, 2023:12.
[15]	张妍, 张彦通. 从互动到联动:20世纪中后期教育科学与公共政策的关系变迁研究[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(6):41-46. doi: 10.16697/j.1674-5485.2020.06.007
[16]	TURNER S, RISJORD M. Philosophy of anthropology and sociology[M]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2006:29.
[17]	COSMIDER L. The adapted mind[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:163.
[18]	李政涛. 教育学的边界与教育科学的未来:走向独特且独立的“教育科学”[J]. 教育研究, 2018(4):4-14.
[19]	徐文彬, 魏同玉. 教育研究中的单向度思维及其突破[J]. 教育科学, 2020(5):41-48.
[20]	项贤明. 论教育学作为科学之应该与可能[J]. 教育研究, 2015(1):16-17.