The Circle Structure and Characteristics of Outstanding Teachers' Academic Core Competences

Abstract

Abstract:

Exploring the structure and elements of university teachers' core academic ability is an urgent need to promote the professional development of university teachers and improve the quality of undergraduate teaching.The teaching and academic ability of outstanding university teachers are presented as a circle-layer structure as a whole, including three circle layers: core layer, middle layer, and edge layer, covering six levels of value, emotion, knowledge, method, interpersonal and technology, each level It is composed of different ability elements and exerts different values and functions.Compared with existing research, the circle structure of teaching and academic ability distinguishes the structural role of different abilities, takes into account the level and specificity, highlights the unique value of value, interpersonal and technical ability, and deepens people's internal cognition of the structure of teaching academic ability, andpresents cultural characteristics and contemporary elements.

Key words: university teachers, outstanding teacher, teaching academic, core competence, teacher competence

CLC Number:

G451.6

Liu Gang, Ding Sanqing. The Circle Structure and Characteristics of Outstanding Teachers' Academic Core Competences[J]. Education Science, 2020, 36(6): 53-60.

Figures/Tables 1

References 20

[1]	Michael K.Potter, Erika D.H.Kustra. The Relationship Between Scholarly Teachingand SOTL: Models, Distinctions,and Clarifications[J]. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2011,5(1):1-18.
[2]	Cambridge. B. L. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A National Initiative[M]// M. Kaplan,D. Lieberman. To Improve the Academy: Resource for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
[3]	Michael B. Paulsen. The Relation Between Research and the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(86):19-29.
[4]	Pope-Ruark. R. Back to Our Roots:An Invitation to Strengthen Disciplinary Arguments via the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning[J]. Business Communication Quarterly, 2002,75(4):357-376.
[5]	Carolin Kreber, Patricia A. Cranton. Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 2000,71(4):476-495.
[6]	Trigwell. K, Martin. E, Benjamin. J, etc. Scholarship of Teaching: A Model[J]. Higher Education Research and Development, 2000,19(2):155-168.
[7]	Michael Prosser. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: What Is It? A Personal View[J]. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2008,2(2):10-18.
[8]	周玉容, 李玉梅. 大学教师教学学术能力结构及其评价[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2015(3):78-84.
[9]	周鲜华, 黄勇, 马秀坤. 基于“九成分”模型的教学学术评价体系研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(3):375-378.
[10]	周光礼, 马海泉. 教学学术能力:大学教师发展与评价的新框架[J]. 教育研究, 2013(8):37-47.
[11]	徐萍. 高校教学学术能力的构成及其发展研究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2016(9):18-23.
[12]	[美] 肯·贝恩. 如何成为卓越的大学教师[M]. 明廷雄,彭汉良,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 131.
[13]	吕达, 周满生. 当代外国教育改革著名文献(美国卷·第三册)[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2004: 25.
[14]	[澳] 约翰·比格斯, 凯瑟琳·唐. 卓越的大学教学——建构教与学的一致性[M]. 王颖,等译. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2015: 4.
[15]	[美] 安迪·哈格里夫斯. 知识社会中的教学[M]. 熊建辉,等译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社,2007:中文版序.
[16]	Shulman. L.S. Teaching as Community Property: Putting an End to Pedagogical Solitude[J]. Change, 1993(6):6-7. pmid: 10243438
[17]	[美] 约翰·S·布鲁贝克. 高等教育哲学[M]. 王承绪,等译. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 2001: 102.
[18]	Milton D. Cox.Fostering the Scholarship of Teaching and Lea-rning through Faculty Learning Communities[J]. Excellence in College Teaching, 2003,14(2/3):161-198.
[19]	[美] 康斯坦斯·库克. 等. 提升大学教学能力——教学中心的作用[M]. 陈劲, 郑尧丽,译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2011: 128.
[20]	[美] 迈克尔·霍恩, 希瑟·斯特克. 混合式学习——用颠覆式创新推动教育革命[M]. 聂风华, 等译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 5.