教育科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 90-96.

• 比较教育研究 • 上一篇    

政策工具视角下美国教师教育问责的策略及启示*

王丽佳   

  1. 华东师范大学 教育学系,上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-08-26
  • 作者简介:王丽佳(1985- ),女(满族),辽宁北镇人,华东师范大学教育学系副教授,博士,主要从事教师教育、教育政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    *国家社会科学基金教育学重大项目“适应老龄社会的教育体系完善研究”(VKA180005)

Strategies and Implications of Teacher Education Accountability in the United States from the Perspective of Policy Instruments

Wang Lijia   

  1. Department of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-08-26

摘要:

引入政策工具对教师教育参与主体进行问责,并建立相应的问责体系,是保障教师教育质量的一条有效路径。从政策运行所共用的机制角度,命令、利诱、能量建设、系统改变及意念是五种常见的政策工具,它们在基本要素、预期结果、成本与收益等方面呈现出差异。近些年来,为了充分保障新入职教师的质量,美国联邦政府借助多样政策工具的作用,建立起多级教师教育问责体系:以利诱式的拨款诱导各州承担保障教师培养质量的责任,以命令式的法案建立起四级教师培养责任承担体系,以面向指标达成的建议式支持策略实现有限的能量建设,以基于资助替代性项目发展的系统变革促进机构间的良性竞争。然而,美国联邦政府加强教师教育问责的必要性却遭到了诸多利益相关者的质疑。同时,在“目的—手段”框架下,其所使用政策工具的有效性也陷入利诱与命令局部有效、系统变革效果难以全面奏效、需要进行能量建设的机构能量不足等困局。在我国未来建设全面教师教育质量问责体系的过程中,可以借鉴美国的成功经验,从推行指向于单个项目的质量报告制度入手,透过制定针对新建教师教育机构或项目的准入标准、支持教师教育机构的能量建设、推动对话基础上的质量共识等方式,实现教师教育“外促”与“内生”质量间的互动。

关键词: 教师教育, 教育质量, 质量保障, 质量问责, 政策工具

Abstract:

It is an effective way to ensure the quality of teacher education by introducing policy instruments to hold the participants accountable and establishing corresponding accountability system.From the perspective of the common mechanism of policy operation, command, inducement, energy building, system change and idea are five common policy instruments, which differ in basic elements, expected results, costs and benefits.In recent years, in order to fully guarantee the quality of new teachers, the US federal government has established a multi-level teacher education accountability system through the use of various policy instruments which are funds inducement leading states to assume responsibility for ensuring the quality of teacher training, imperative bills constructing a four-levels teacher training responsibility system, target-oriented recommendations achieving limited energy construction, and alternative project development promoting healthy competition among institutions. In China’s building of its teacher education accountability system, learning from the US, we could construct an evidence-based reporting system which is about the quality of individual teacher education program. Through laying out entry standard for new programs and assisting in capacity building, a kind of internal and external quality assurance system based on shared understanding should be achieved.

Key words: teacher education, quality of education, quality assurance, quality accountability, policy instruments

中图分类号: