视频俱乐部能否促进新手与资深教师对课堂事件的注意*

教育科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 41-47.

视频俱乐部能否促进新手与资深教师对课堂事件的注意^*

郑艺璇¹, 夏玉溪², 赵灿然³

¹ 华东师范大学课程与教学研究所, 上海 200062
² 剑桥大学教育学院, 英国剑桥 CB2 8PQ
³ 广州市海珠区第二实验小学, 广东广州 510310

出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-09-29
作者简介:郑艺璇(1996- ),女,福建福州人,华东师范大学课程与教学研究所博士生,主要从事课程与教学论、教师教育研究;
夏玉溪(2000- ),女,贵州遵义人,剑桥大学教育学院博士生,主要从事教师教育、课堂话语研究;
赵灿然(1977- ),女,湖南湘潭人,广州市海珠区第二实验小学校长,小学语文高级教师,主要从事小学语文教学研究。
基金资助:
^*广东省教育科学规划2022年度中小学教师教育科研能力提升计划项目“小学语文‘学思行’教学行动研究”(2022YQJK004)

Can Video Clubs Enhance Novice and Veteran Teachers’ Noticing of Classroom Events?

Zheng Yixuan¹, Xia Yuxi², Zhao Canran³

¹ Institution of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
² Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8PQ, United Kingdom
³ Haizhu District the Secondary Experimental Primary School Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510310, China

Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-09-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究在广州市的一所小学设计并实施了一学期的视频俱乐部项目,旨在考察该教师学习模式能否在中国情境下促进不同专业发展阶段教师的注意能力发展。基于教师注意的五维度分析框架,研究发现:在初始阶段,新手教师更关注课堂管理,倾向于细致描述其注意到的课堂事件;资深教师更关注学生思维,倾向于直接评价或提供替代性方案。经过一学期的参与,教师对学生思维的关注度整体上升,对课堂管理的关注度整体下降。新手教师的注意能力呈现出更明显的发展趋势,尤其体现为推理立场的增加;资深教师对课堂事件的注意从抽象判断转向基于证据的叙事评价。本研究为考察视频俱乐部在中国教研情境下促进教师学习的成效、发掘新手与资深教师不同的注意优势提供了启示。

关键词: 视频俱乐部, 教师注意, 教师专业发展, 新手教师, 资深教师

Abstract:

This study designed and implemented a one-semester video club project in a primary school in Guangzhou to examine whether this teacher learning model could enhance teacher noticing across different stages of professional development in the Chinese context. Drawing on the five-dimensional analytical framework of teacher noticing, the study found that, at the initial stage, novice teachers attended more to classroom management and tended to describe noticed classroom events in detail, while veteran teachers focused more on students’ thinking and tended to evaluate events directly or propose alternative instructional solutions. After one semester of participation, teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking increased overall, whereas their noticing of classroom management decreased. Novice teachers showed more pronounced development in noticing, especially in the increased use of an inferential stance. Veteran teachers’ noticing of classroom events shifted from abstract judgment to evidence-based narrative evaluation. This study offers insights into the effectiveness of video clubs in promoting teacher learning within China’s school-based teaching research context and into the different noticing strengths of novice and veteran teachers.

Key words: video clubs, teacher noticing, teacher professional development, novice teacher, veteran teacher

中图分类号:

G451

郑艺璇, 夏玉溪, 赵灿然. 视频俱乐部能否促进新手与资深教师对课堂事件的注意^*[J]. 教育科学, 2026, 42(4): 41-47.

Zheng Yixuan, Xia Yuxi, Zhao Canran. Can Video Clubs Enhance Novice and Veteran Teachers’ Noticing of Classroom Events?[J]. Education Science, 2026, 42(4): 41-47.

图/表 3

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 15

[1]	Van E E A, Sherin M G. Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions[J]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2002, 10(4): 571-596.
[2]	Van ES E A, Sherin M G. Expanding on prior conceptualizations of teacher noticing[J]. ZDM-mathematics Education, 2021, 53(1): 17-27. doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01211-4
[3]	Star J R, Strickland S K. Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice[J]. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2008, 11(2).
[4]	丁福军, 孙炳海. 专家型教师课堂洞察力国际研究图景及展望[J]. 教师教育研究, 2024, 36(1):122-128.
[5]	Jacobs V R, Lamb L L C, Philipp R A. Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking[J]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2010, 41(2):169-202. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
[6]	李让美, 郭衎, 曹一鸣. 专家型教师与职前教师的专业洞察力比较研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2023, 32(2):59-64.
[7]	Keller L, Cortina K S, Müller K, et al. Noticing and weighing alternatives in the reflection of regular classroom teaching: evidence of expertise using mobile eye-tracking[J]. Instructional Science, 2022, 50(2): 251-272. doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09570-5
[8]	Yang Xinrong, König J, Kaiser G. Growth of professional noticing of mathematics teachers: a comparative study of Chinese teachers noticing with different teaching experiences[J]. ZDM-mathematics Education, 2021, 53(1).
[9]	Sherin M G, Han S Y. Teacher learning in the context of a video club[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2004, 20(2).
[10]	Van ES E A, Sherin M G. The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice[J]. Journal of mathematics Teacher Education, 2010, 13(2):155-176. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
[11]	Kennedy M M. How does professional development improve teaching?[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2016, 86(4): 945-980. doi: 10.3102/0034654315626800
[12]	周序, 王卉. 教师培训如何逾越理论与实践之间的鸿沟[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(4):67-72.
[13]	魏宏聚, 李婷婷. 课堂教学切片诊断:一种基于视频的崭新教师专业发展模式[J]. 教育科学, 2026, 42(3):68-74.
[14]	张学民, 申继亮. 国外教师教学专长及发展理论述评[J]. 比较教育研究, 2001(3):1-5.
[15]	Martin N K, Baldwin B. Validation of an inventory ofclassroom management style: differences between novice and experienced teachers[C]// Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta: American Educational Research Association, 1993.

化名	性别	授课年级	教龄	专业发展阶段	第一次	第七次
李老师	女	二年级	1	新手教师	+	+
郝老师	女	二年级	2	新手教师	+	+
胥老师	女	五年级	2	新手教师	+	+
田老师	女	三年级	7	资深教师	+	+
梁老师	女	二年级	16	资深教师	+	+
秦老师	女	五年级	26	资深教师	+	+
陈老师	女	四年级	25	资深教师	/	+

	码号		新手教师			资深教师			总体
	码号		郝老师	胥老师	李老师	田老师	梁老师	秦老师	总体
主题	学生思维	17%		50%	23%	55%	45%	27%	35%
	教学策略	25%		30%	23%	18%	25%	27%	24%
	课堂管理	46%		20%	46%	23%	15%	27%	30%
	课堂环境	12%		0%	8%	4%	10%	13%	9%
	其他	0%		0%	0%	0%	5%	6%	2%
主体	学生	63%		70%	69%	68%	65%	67%	66%
	教师	12%		10%	15%	18%	15%	20%	15%
	自己	21%		10%	8%	9%	10%	13%	13%
	物品	4%		0%	8%	0%	0%	0%	2%
	教材	0%		10%	0%	5%	10%	0%	4%
立场	描述	50%		40%	77%	18%	35%	13%	38%
	评价	25%		10%	8%	32%	35%	40%	27%
	推理	25%		50%	15%	50%	30%	47%	35%
细节程度	抽象的	33%		30%	8%	45%	45%	47%	37%
细节程度	具体的	67%		70%	92%	55%	55%	53%	63%
证据	基于视频	46%		20%	85%	45%	40%	27%	44%
证据	非基于视频	54%		80%	15%	55%	60%	73%	56%

	码号	第一次		第七次		趋势
主题	学生思维	37	35%	18	67%	↑↑
	教学策略	25	24%	8	30%	↑
	课堂管理	31	30%	1	3%	↓↓
	课堂环境	9	9%	0	0%	↓
	其他	2	2%	0	0%	基本持平
主体	学生	69	66%	22	82%	↑↑
	教师	16	15%	3	11%	基本持平
	自己	13	13%	2	7%	↓
	物品	2	2%	0	0%	基本持平
	教材	4	4%	0	0%	基本持平
立场	描述	39	38%	9	33%	↓
	评价	28	27%	7	26%	基本持平
	推理	37	35%	11	41%	↑
细节程度	抽象的	38	37%	1	4%	↓↓
细节程度	具体的	66	63%	26	96%	↑↑
证据	基于视频	46	44%	22	81%	↑↑
证据	非基于视频	58	56%	5	19%	↓↓