融合教育的价值意蕴与实践路径*——基于卢曼社会系统理论的分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

融合教育是保证教育公平而有质量的关键要素,是解决教育发展中不平衡、不充分问题的有效路径。随着社会的进步与多元化发展,学者们日益关注如何有效实施融合教育以更好地满足不同学生的需求。融合教育的发展经历了隔离教育时期、部分融合时期和完全融合时期的演变过程,体现出社会对融合教育的理解与认可是逐渐深化的。融合教育涉及多样性、平等、质量、权利等相关概念,具有追求教育公平切实实现、尊重个体差异多元发展、促进社会发展深度融合的价值意蕴。卢曼的社会系统理论,从社会结构和功能分化角度出发,将教育作为现代社会系统的重要子系统,为融合教育提供了三方面实践路径,即增强共通性价值认同、建立包容性学习环境和提供个性化学习支持。

关键词: 融合教育, 价值意蕴, 实践路径, 社会系统理论

Abstract:

Inclusive education is a key component in ensuring fair and quality education and offers an effective solution to the issues of imbalance and inadequate development of education. With societal progress and diverse development, scholars are increasingly concerned about how to effectively implement inclusive education to better meet the needs of different students. The development of inclusive education has evolved through periods of segregated education, partial integration, and full integration, reflecting a deepening societal understanding and recognition of integrated education. Inclusive education involves related concepts such as diversity, equality, quality and rights, and has the value implication of pursuing tangible equity in education, respecting individual differences and diverse development, and promoting the deep integration of social development. Luhmann’s social systems theory, which considers education as a vital subsystem within the modern societal system from the perspectives of social structure and functional differentiation, provides three practical approaches to integrated education: enhancing a shared value identity, establishing an inclusive learning environment, and providing personalized learning support.

Key words: inclusive education, value implication, practical approaches, Social Systems Theory

中图分类号:

史仁民, 王吉. 融合教育的价值意蕴与实践路径^*——基于卢曼社会系统理论的分析[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(2): 52-59.

Shi Renmin, Wang Ji. The Value and Practical Approaches of Inclusive Education—An Analysis Based on Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory[J]. Education Science, 2024, 40(2): 52-59.

参考文献 53

[1]	[49] 蒲蕊, 张杨. 我国融合教育政策变迁的三维审视与展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2024(1):73-84.
[2]	[40] 于松梅. 融合教育背景下特殊教育的认同危机与发展理路反思[J]. 教育科学, 2023(1):62-68.
[3]	UNICEF. Inclusive education: every child has the right to quality education and learning[EB/OL]. (2024-04-22)[2023-12-23]. https://www.unicef.org/education/inclusive-education.
[4]	WARD L F. Dynamic sociology[M]. Sterling: Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018:136.
[5]	郑杭生, 杨敏. 社会学理论体系的构建与拓展:简析个人与社会的关系问题在社会学理论研究中的意义[J]. 社会学研究, 2004(2):25-34.
[6]	[41] 周志家. 社会系统与社会和谐:卢曼社会系统理论的整合观探析[C]. 中国科学院中国现代化研究中心.第四期中国现代化研究论坛论文集. 2006:109-113[2023-12-23]. https://kns.cnki.net/reader/review?invoice=XCPbFM9bXi1RPKp3x0jwcri4d56h4pPfv8LA1pcaALmmf8WdJYLWvFRGlyH%2FHwBhgR0Ucm7p2HB5G6vMIHJf6tHHEgYElWT2Z8VY95nrajqxi6HsLH5G0vaJX9N5mavNMLmZzz0jxIlpbKFlbHaK661GtlCAnCyN4CDkeLJ5hAA%3D&platform=NZKPT&product=CPFD&filename=XHYJ200608001017&tablename=cpfd9908&type=CONFERENCE&scope=trial&cflag=overlay&dflag=pdf&pages=&language=CHS&trial=&nonce=FBC8A1846422435EBA411BCD3DF71CEB.
[7]	BERGER P L, LUCKMANN T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge[M]. 1st ed. Garden City,N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966:32.
[8]	DUNN L M. Special education for the mildly retarded:is much of it justifiable?[J]. Exceptional children, 1968(35):5-22.
[9]	HÄRMÄ J, KUMPULAINEN S. Towards inclusive education: Teachers' conceptions of the barriers to learning and their practices as ways to support all learners[J]. Early child development and care, 2018, 188(5), 639-652.
[10]	[15] 杨梅, 袁李兰. “全纳”还是“特殊”:英国关于全纳教育的争议[J]. 比较教育研究, 2017, 39(3):82-88.
[11]	HARING N G. Overview of special education[C]// HARING N G, MCCORMICK L, HARING T G. Exceptional children and youth. New York: Macmillan College Publishing, 1994:2-63.
[12]	[13] [17] [48] 邓猛. 融合教育理论指南[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017:39-40,42,63,150.
[14]	威廉·L. 休厄德. 特殊儿童:特殊教育导论[M]. 7版.孟晓,等译. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 2007:15-16.
[16]	STAINBACK W, STAINBACK S. A rationale for the merger of special and regular education[J]. Exceptional children. 1984, 51(2):102-111. pmid: 6238827
[18]	中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》[EB/OL].(2019-02-23)[2023-12-22]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html.
[19]	国务院办公厅关于转发教育部等部门“十四五”特殊教育发展提升行动计划的通知[EB/OL].(2021-12-31)[2023-12-22]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202201/t20220125_596312.html.
[20]	丁东红. 卢曼和他的“社会系统理论”[J]. 世界哲学, 2005(5):34-38.
[21]	[24][46][47] 高宣扬. 鲁曼社会系统理论与现代性[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016:121,35,137-138,138.
[22]	谭光鼎, 王丽云. 教育社会学:人物与思想[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2009:348.
[23]	周兰芳. 卢曼社会系统理论视野下的全纳教育[J]. 教育评论, 2013(6):147-149.
[25]	FORD J, MONGON D, WHELAN M. Special education and social control: invisible disasters[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982:9-34.
[26]	UNESCO. International day of education[EB/OL].(2024-01-24)[2024-01-25]. https://www.unesco.org/en/days/education.
[28]	UNESCO. A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education[R]. Paris: UNESCO, 2017.
[29]	胡佳佳, 吴海鸥. 联合国教科文组织发布“教育2030行动框架”:描画全球未来教育的模样[N]. 中国教育报,2015-11-15.
[30]	AINSCOW M. Inclusion and equity in education: making sense of global challenges[J]. Prospects, 2020(49):123-134.
[31]	林珮如. 特殊教育并不特殊:从特殊教育的特殊性谈融合教育之现状与未来[J]. 特殊教育季刊, 2011(120):11-18.
[32]	SHAPIRO A. Everyday belongs: changing negative attitude toward classmates with disabilities[M]. New York: Garland Publishing, 2000:20-21.
[33]	FALVEY M A, GIVNER C C, KIMM C. What is an inclusive school?[C]// VILLA R A,THOUSAND J S. Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1995:34-58.
[34]	ZIONTS P. Inclusion strategies for students with learning and behavior problems: perspectives, experiences, and best practices[M]. Austin, TX: Pro Ed, 1997.
[35]	SMITH T E, POLLOWAY E A, PATTON J R, et al. Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings[M]. Upper Saddle River,NJ: Pearson, 2014.
[36]	Ofsted. How well new teachers are prepared to teach pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities[R]. London: Ofsted, 2008.
[37]	吉祥佩, 胡金平. 乡村振兴战略下乡村学校教育发展的境遇与突破:基于卢曼社会系统理论的视角[J]. 当代教育科学, 2023(2):63-72.
[38]	HERNÁNDEZ-TORRANO D, SOMERTON M, HELMER J. Mapping research on inclusive education since Salamanca Statement: a bibliometric review of the literature over 25 years[J], International journal of inclusive education, 2020(3):1-20.
[39]	ALPER S. An ecological approach to identifying curriculum content for inclusive settings[M].2nd ed. Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings. Boston: Pearson Education, 2003:73-85.
[42]	黄英杰. 试论教育即是立“心”[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2018(11):38-43.
[43]	UNESCO. Youth report 2020: Inclusion and education—all means all[EB/OL]. (2020-04-28)[2023-12-23]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373878.
[44]	WOODCOCK S, GIBBS K, HITCHES E, et al. Investigating teachers’ beliefs in inclusive education and their levels of teacher self-efficacy: are teachers constrained in their capacity to implement inclusive teaching practices?[J] Education sciences, 2023, 13(3):280.
[45]	杜健荣. 法律系统的自治:论卢曼对法律自治理论的重建[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(4):507-512.
[50]	HUNT P F. Salamanca Statement and IDEA 2004: possibilities of practice for inclusive education[J]. International journal of inclusive education, 2011, 15(4): 461-476.
[51]	秦明瑞. 复杂性与社会系统:卢曼思想研究[J]. 系统辩证学学报, 2003(1):19-25.
[52]	杜健荣. 社会系统与社会和谐:卢曼社会系统理论的整合观探析[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(8):507-512.
[53]	中华人民共和国教育部. 国务院办公厅关于转发教育部等部门“十四五”特殊教育发展提升行动计划的通知[EB/OL].(2021-12-31)[2023-12-22]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202201/t20220125_596312.html.

融合教育的价值意蕴与实践路径^*——基于卢曼社会系统理论的分析

The Value and Practical Approaches of Inclusive Education—An Analysis Based on Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 53

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柳海民, 侯怀银, 余文森, 李敏. 基础教育改革与学科建设(笔谈)[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(5): 1-14.
[2]	闫守轩, 佟金泽. 人工智能时代教师教学情感的价值、特征及培育^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(5): 31-36.
[3]	翁伟斌, 张良. 新时代劳动教育的价值审视与实践路径^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(2): 41-47.
[4]	于松梅. 融合教育背景下特殊教育的认同危机与发展理路反思^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(1): 62-68.
[5]	袁利平. 教育缓解相对贫困的价值意蕴、行动逻辑及制度安排^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(2): 14-21.
[6]	冯雅静, 王雁. 普通师范专业融合教育通识课程的构建^*——基于实践导向的模式[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(5): 70-77.