国际学界教育研究中心的演进(1997—2019年)*——基于主题、机构和国家的视角

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

绘制1997—2019年国际学界教育研究文献的主题聚类知识图谱,获取“中心主题”、“中心机构”和“中心国家”,旨在从“中心”视角探究国际学界教育研究的演进。国际学界教育研究中心主题的演进主要表现为:研究视域始终围绕时代话语主题而延展,研究取向由回应教育实践需求向兼顾理论创新与实践求索转变,研究对象自关注教师队伍向注重学生群体过渡,研究方法从着重运用单种研究方法向混合使用多种研究方法转换。国际学界教育研究中心机构的演进主要表现为:数量阶跃式扩增,单个中心机构学术“中心度”降低;类型占比两极化,高校类中心机构稳居主导地位;合作模式多样化,“科研共同体”渐趋主流。国际学界教育研究中心国家的演进主要表现为:格局结构由发达国家主导转变为发达国家与发展中国家协同参与;地理分布由核心点布式扩散为集群星散式。

关键词: 国际学界, 教育研究, 中心主题, 中心机构, 中心国家

Abstract:

This study aims to explore the evolution of the educational research focuses in international academia by drawing the topic clustering knowledge map of educational research literature from 1997 to 2019, so as to obtain the “central themes”, “central institutions”, and “central countries”. The evolution of educational research focuses mainly reflects that the research horizon has always been extended around the theme of the discourse of the times, the research orientation has changed from responding to the needs of educational practice to taking into account theoretical innovation and practical pursuit, and the research object has shifted from focusing on teachers to focusing on students, the research method has shifted from focusing on using a single research method to using a mixture of multiple research methods. The evolution of educational research institutions in international academia mainly manifests that the number of educational research centers has increased in steps, and the academic “centrality” of a single central institution is reduced; the proportion of types is polarized, and the university-type center institutions are firmly in the leading position; the cooperation model is diversified, and scientific research community is gradually becoming mainstream. The evolution of the international academic educational research center countries demonstrates that the pattern structure is dominated by developed countries, and the developed countries and developing countries participate in synergy; the geographical distribution has changed from the core point distribution to the cluster and scattered type.

Key words: international academia, educational research, central theme, central institution, central country

中图分类号:

G40-03

潘黎, 邢颖. 国际学界教育研究中心的演进(1997—2019年)^*——基于主题、机构和国家的视角[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(2): 61-68.

Pan Li, Xing Ying. Evolution of the Educational Research Focuses in International Academia (1997—2019)—Based on Thematic, Institutional, and National Perspectives[J]. Education Science, 2022, 38(2): 61-68.

图/表 1

参考文献 44

[1]	郭元祥. 元教育学概论:元教育学的性质、对象、方法及意义[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 1994(2):17-26.
[2]	唐莹, 瞿葆奎. 元理论与元教育学引论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 1995(1):1-14.
[3]	约翰·德斯蒙德·贝尔纳. 历史上的科学:科学学萌芽期[M]. 伍况甫,彭家礼,译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015:X.
[4]	侯剑华, 杨秀财, 李莲姬. 科学计量学研究中心转移特征的可视化分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(2):211-220.
[5]	PAN L, AN T T. The evolutionary characteristics of higher education studies worldwide: central themes and regions[J]. Studies in higher education, 2021(12): 2568-2580.
[6]	SOLSKEN J, WILLETT J, WILSON-KEENAN J A. Cultivating hybrid texts in multicultural classrooms: “promise and challenge”[J]. Research in the teaching of english, 2000, 35(2):179-212.
[7]	WEINSTEIN C S, TOMLINSON-CLARKE S, CURRAN M. Toward a conception of culturally responsive classroom management[J]. Journal of teacher education, 2004, 55(1):25-38. doi: 10.1177/0022487103259812
[8]	DIXON L Q, ZHAO J, SHIN J Y, et al. What we know about second language acquisition: a synthesis from four perspectives[J]. Review of educational research, 2012, 82(1):5-60. doi: 10.3102/0034654311433587
[9]	ROBERTS L. Individual differences in second language sentence processing[J]. Language learning, 2012(62):172-188.
[10]	LIPKA O, SIEGEL L S. The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning english as a second language[J]. Reading and writing, 2012, 25(8):1873-1898. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8
[11]	GARCIA O. The multiplicities of multilingual interaction[J]. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 2018, 21(7):881-891. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2018.1474851
[12]	MELO-PFEIFER S, SA M. Multilingual interaction in chat rooms: translanguaging to learn and learning to translanguage[J]. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 2018, 21(7): 867-880. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2018.1452895
[13]	RUDASILL K M, RIMM-KAUFMAN S E. Teacher-child relationship quality: the roles of child temperament and teacher-child interactions[J]. Early childhood research quarterly, 2009, 24(2):107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.12.003
[14]	RUMMEL N, MULLINS D, SPADA H. Scripted collaborative learning with the cognitive tutor algebra[J]. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2012, 7(2):307-339. doi: 10.1007/s11412-012-9146-z
[15]	ONRUBIA J, ENGEL A. The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks[J]. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2012, 7(1):161-186. doi: 10.1007/s11412-011-9125-9
[16]	HANRAHAN M. Rethinking science literacy: enhancing communication and participation in school science through affirmational dialogue journal writing[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 1999, 36(6):699-718. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<699::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-P
[17]	CARLONE H B. The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: girls’ access, participation, and resistance[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 2004, 41(4):392-414. doi: 10.1002/tea.20006
[18]	BARAK M, DORI Y J. Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an it environment[J]. Science education, 2005, 89(1):117-139. doi: 10.1002/sce.20027
[19]	余清臣. 基于教育实践问题的教育理论实践应用机制[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2019(9):9-16.
[20]	WU Y T, TSAI C C. High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures[J]. International journal of science education, 2010, 33(3):371-400. doi: 10.1080/09500690903505661
[21]	SAMPSON V, BLANCHARD M R. Science teachers and scientific argumentation: trends in views and practice[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 2012, 49(9):1122-1148. doi: 10.1002/tea.21037
[22]	HORNE K, BELL P. Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school[J]. Journal of the learning sciences, 2017, 26(3):437-476. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689
[23]	GUNEY B G, SEKER H. Discovering socio-cultural aspects of science through artworks[J]. Science education, 2017, 26(7-9):867-887.
[24]	CHEN Y C, BENUS M J, HERNANDEZ J. Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation[J]. Science education, 2019, 103(5):1235-1276. doi: 10.1002/sce.21527
[25]	ADAMS P E, KROCKOVER G H. Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers[J]. Science education, 1997, 81(1):29-50. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:1<29::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-3
[26]	VOLKMANN M J, ANDERSON M A. Creating professional identity: dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher[J]. Science education, 1998, 82(3):293-310. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<293::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-7
[27]	FREEMAN D, JOHNSON K E. Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education[J]. TESOL quarterly, 1998, 32(3):397-417. doi: 10.2307/3588114
[28]	ZEE E H. Preparing teachers as researchers in courses on methods of teaching science[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 1998, 35(7):791-809. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199809)35:7<791::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-G
[29]	HOFFMAN J, PEARSON P D. Reading teacher education in the next millennium: what your grandmother’s teacher didn’t know that your granddaughter’s teacher should[J]. Reading research quarterly, 2000, 35(1):28-44. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.1.3
[30]	WINDSCHITL M. Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?[J]. Science education, 2003, 87(1):112-143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
[31]	LOTTER C, HARWOOD W S, BONNER J J. The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 2010, 44(9):1318-1347. doi: 10.1002/tea.20191
[32]	OTTENBREIT-LEFTWICH A T, GLAZEWSKI K D, NEWBY T J, et al. Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: addressing professional and student needs[J]. Computers education, 2010, 55(3):1321-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
[33]	O’NEILL S, STEPHENSON J. Exploring australian pre-service teachers sense of efficacy, its sources, and some possible influences[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2012, 28(4):535-545. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.008
[34]	MARTIN N K, SASS D A, SCHMITT T A. Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: a theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers’ intent-to-leave[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2012, 28(4):546-559. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.003
[35]	HULTELL D, BO M L, GUSTAVSSON J P. Getting personal with teacher burnout: a longitudinal study on the development of burnout using a person-based approach[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2013(32):75-86.
[36]	FENG L, SASS T R. Teacher quality and teacher mobility[J]. Education finance and policy, 2017, 12(3):396-418. doi: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00214
[37]	BRADFORD C, BRAATEN M. Teacher evaluation and the demoralization of teachers[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2018(75):49-59.
[38]	孙冬梅, 黄坤. 教育研究范式及方法的变革与融合[J]. 中国高教研究, 2009(2):30-32.
[39]	METZ K E, CARDACE A, BERSON E, et al. Primary grade children’s capacity to understand microevolution: the power of leveraging their fruitful intuitions and engagement in scientific practices[J]. Journal of the learning sciences, 2019, 28(4-5):556-615. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2019.1667806
[40]	JOHNSON R B. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come[J]. Educational researcher, 2004, 33(7):14-26.
[41]	韩双淼, 谢静. 国外教育研究方法的应用特征:基于2000-2019年34本教育学SSCI收录期刊的文献计量分析[J]. 高等教育研究, 2021, 42(1):68-76.
[42]	杜晓利. 世界教育研究中心的转移及其相关问题[J]. 全球教育展望, 2004, 33(6):56-59.
[43]	高书国. 2030中国将回归世界教育中心地位[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2017(4):1-6.
[44]	赵文平. 认识教育研究的理性特质[J]. 现代教育管理, 2021(3):10-16.