教育科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 58-63.

• 高等教育研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校学生人身伤害风险管理:反思与重构*

郭洁1, 郭宁2   

  1. 1.陕西师范大学 教育学院,陕西 西安 710062
    2.美国圣路易斯大学 教育学院,密苏里 圣路易斯 63103
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-10 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-08-12
  • 作者简介:郭洁(1973- ),女,江苏无锡人,陕西师范大学教育学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要从事学生事务管理研究;|郭宁(1978- ),女,江苏无锡人,美国圣路易斯大学教育学院博士生,主要从事学生事务管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    * 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2017年度教育学一般课题“非传统安全观视野下的高校学生事务风险与危机管理优化研究”(BFA170058)

Risk Management of Physical Harm and Death for University Students: Reflection and Reconstruction

Guo Jie1, Guo Ning2   

  1. 1. Educational Institute, Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an Shaanxi 710062, China
    2. School of Education, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis MO 63103,USA
  • Received:2020-03-10 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-08-12

RichHTML

292

PDF

549

摘要：

高校学生人身伤害事件可致学生身心创伤与经济损害,致院校陷入舆情危机与财务困窘,故需给予有效管理。然而,当前院校该领域管理却存在以下问题与不足:院校对相关事件的后续处置易遭受人性关怀缺失的道德诘责;高校学生人身伤害风险赔偿(补偿)的资金不足;在学生管理方面院校各部门间缺乏有机整合;院校中承担学生日常管理工作的辅导员群体工作压力大,队伍稳定性不足;高校学生人身伤害事件中极端案例所引发的消极社会影响不容忽视。导致以上不利的原因包括:院校管理理念囿于法律“归责”原则而不能关照现实需求;对高校学生人身伤害事件可能诱发的院校多元风险,乃至国家与社会安全风险应有更全面的认识;高校学生人身伤害风险责任应在多责任主体间得到合理划分;院校该领域管理环境不佳,其所能获得的资源与技术支持不足。欲突破以上困境,应以“和谐”理念关照该领域管理,升华该领域管理目标;以多元责任主体合作分担的方式构建高校学生人身伤害风险救济基金制度;以加强校内各管理部门间的协同合作,多渠道吸纳优秀人员进入学生事务管理队伍来提升管理成效;以整合社会多元主体功能,构建学生人身伤害风险管理系统来推进该领域管理的日臻完善。

关键词: 高校管理, 学生事务管理, 人身伤害, 多元风险, 风险管理

Abstract:

Physical harm and death (PHD) of students in higher education can bring physical harm and mental trauma to students,and it can also expose higher educational institutions to public opinion crises and financial adversity. Therefore, PHD needs to be addressed with effective management. However, current management of college students’ PHD is found to be problematic and less adequatebecause of the following five reasons. First, colleges and universities are vulnerable to the moral criticism on the lack of humane concerns when PHD is addressed; Second, funds for university students’ PHD compensation is insufficient; Third, in the aspect of student management, there is a lack of organic integration among different related departments/sections. Fourth, college students’ political & ideological instructors are under great pressure and lack of workforce instability. Fifth, the negative social influence caused by extreme cases in college students’ PHD.And the above disadvantages are resulted from those can be attributed to the followings, namely, 1) the management of higher education is confined by the philosophy of “being legally accountable” rather than being responsive to the actual needs and requirements; 2) the failure to fully recognize multiple risks on campus and those existing in the society and in the country; 3) the failure to identify the corresponding responsibility among multiple actors; and 4)limited management environment as well aslack of funding, resources and technological support to deal with college students’ PHD. To better address the above-mentioned predicament, the article is intended to call for efforts to improve the management for PHD under the guidance of the philosophy of harmony, to establish college students’ PHD compensation funding system among the multiple actors, to enhance the effectiveness of management through the cooperation among intra-collegiate management departments, to recruit talents into student affairs management for effective management,and to perfect PHD risk management through integrating roles of multiple actors in the society in constructing students’ PHD risk management system in the universities.

Key words: management of higher education, management of student affairs, physical harm anddeath, multiple risks, risk management

中图分类号: