教育科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 15-20.

• 教育基本理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“双减”政策的战略意义、实施挑战与进路选择*

靳玉乐1, 张铭凯2   

  1. 1.深圳大学 教育学部,广东 深圳 518060
    2.西南大学 教育学部,重庆 400715
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-08 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2023-01-17
  • 作者简介:靳玉乐(1966- ),男,河南邓州人,深圳大学教育学部主任,教授,博士生导师,主要从事课程与教学论研究;|张铭凯(1987- ),甘肃天水人,西南大学教育学部副教授,博士,主要从事课程与教学论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划2021年度教育学重点课题“我国义务教育学业负担综合治理研究”(AHA210009)

The Strategic Significance, Implementation Challenges and Route Choices of the “Double Reduction” Policy

Jin Yule1, Zhang Mingkai2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen Guangdong 518060,China
    2. Faculty of Education,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China
  • Received:2021-12-08 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2023-01-17

摘要:

如何有效治理义务教育阶段学生的学业负担过重的问题,是一项颇受关注的重大民生工程。“双减”政策作为治理义务教育阶段学生学业负担过重问题的一记重拳,受到全社会广泛关注,也引发了诸多讨论。诚然,任何政策都不可能尽善尽美,这就要求我们不仅应准确理解政策意图,而且要理性反思政策实践过程中可能出现的挑战。通过调研和理性检讨,从政策评估的视角来看,“双减”政策实施过程中仍然可能面临负担转移、职业倦怠、质量盲区、实质性不公平、资源不足和社会支持弱化等挑战,这会削弱“双减”政策本身的实施成效。为此,应进一步优化政府、社会和学校“三位一体”的治理体系,强化政府治理的权责关系,明晰社会治理的引导作用,突出学校内部治理的主动作为,提升系统治理的协作效能和探索因地制宜的治理张力。

关键词: “双减”政策, 挑战, 政府治理, 社会治理, 学校治理

Abstract:

How to effectively deal with the problem of the heavy academic burden of students in the compulsory education stage is a major livelihood project that has attracted much attention. The “double reduction” policy, as a heavy blow to manage the academic burden of students in the compulsory education stage, has attracted widespread attention from the whole society and has also sparked many discussions. Admittedly, no policy can be perfect, which requires us not only to accurately understand policy intentions, but also to rationally reflect on the challenges that may arise in the process of policy practice. Through research and rational review, from the perspective of policy evaluation, the implementation of the “double reduction” policy may still face challenges such as burden shifting, job burnout, quality blind spots, substantive inequity, insufficient resources, and weakening social support. Weaken the effectiveness of the “double reduction” policy itself. To this end, the “trinity” governance system of the government, society and schools should be further optimized, the power-responsibility relationship of government governance should be strengthened, the guiding role of social governance should be clarified, the initiative of school internal governance should be highlighted, the collaborative efficiency of system governance should be improved, and local conditions should be explored.

Key words: “double reduction” policy, challenge, government governance, social governance, school governance

中图分类号: