“三级预防”模式下英国教师专业伦理失范预防的策略及启示*

教育科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 90-96.

• 比较教育研究 • 上一篇

“三级预防”模式下英国教师专业伦理失范预防的策略及启示^*

王连喜¹, 王萃萃², 刘惊铎³

1.国家开放大学学习资源部,北京 100039
2.信阳师范学院文学院,河南信阳 464000
3.国家开放大学政法教学部,北京 100039

收稿日期:2021-08-18 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-05-07
作者简介:王连喜(1977- ),男,江西上饶人,国家开放大学学习资源部副研究员,博士,主要从事教育理论、教育管理和教育政策研究;|王萃萃(1981- ),女,河北邢台人,信阳师范学院文学院讲师,主要从事教育理论、教育管理研究;|刘惊铎(1961- ),男,陕西眉县人,国家开放大学政法教学部教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事生态体验理论、教育政策研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2017年度教育学一般课题“中小学教师专业伦理问责制的国际比较研究”(BHA170154)

Strategies and Implications of British Teachers’ Professional Ethical Misconduct Prevention under the “Three-Level Prevention Model”

Wang Lianxi¹, Wang Cuicui², Liu Jingduo³

1. Department of Learning Resources,The Open University of China,Beijing 100039,China
2. College of Liberal Arts,Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang Henan 464000,China
3. Department of Politics and Law,The Open University of China,Beijing 100039,China

Received:2021-08-18 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-05-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

引入“三级预防”模式对教师专业伦理失范行为进行分析,并建立相应的预防体系,是我国对教师专业伦理失范治理的一条有效路径。英国为充分保障中小学教师专业伦理失范预防的有效开展,建立了“免疫预防”“先兆预防”“再犯预防”的三级预防体系。我国在未来建设教师专业伦理失范预防体系时,可以借鉴英国的成功经验,注重对教师的“事前育责”,完善“免疫预防”之失范行为“不想为”机制;建构常态化、法制化的“事中督责”体系,完善“征兆预防”之失范行为“不能为”机制;规范教师专业伦理失范行为的“事后追责”制度,完善“再犯预防”之失范行为“不敢为”机制。

关键词: “三级预防”, 教师专业伦理, 失范预防, 策略, 启示

Abstract:

Introducing the “three-level prevention” model to analyze teachers’ professional ethical misconduct behavior and establish a corresponding prevention system is an effective way to manage teachers’ professional ethical misconduct in China. In order to fully guarantee the effective implementation of the prevention of professional ethics anomie among primary and secondary school teachers, the United Kingdom has established a three-level prevention system of “immunization prevention”, “symptom prevention” and “recidivism prevention”. When building a teacher professional ethical misconduct prevention system in the future, China can learn from the successful experience of the United Kingdom, pay attention to the “prior-responsibility” for teachers, and improve the “immune prevention” misconduct behavior “don’t want to do” mechanism; construct a normalized and legalized “process supervision” system, and improve the “can’t do” mechanism for misconduct behavior of “symptom prevention”; standardize the “post-responsibility” system of teachers’ professional ethical misconduct behavior, and the “dare to act” mechanism for “recidivism prevention” misconduct behaviors; standardize the “post-accountability system” of teachers’ professional ethical misconduct, and improve the “dare not to act mechanism” of misconduct behavior.Keywords:Three-Level Prevention; teacher professional ethics; misconduct prevention; strategy; enlightenment

中图分类号:

G635.1

王连喜, 王萃萃, 刘惊铎. “三级预防”模式下英国教师专业伦理失范预防的策略及启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(2): 90-96.

Wang Lianxi, Wang Cuicui, Liu Jingduo. Strategies and Implications of British Teachers’ Professional Ethical Misconduct Prevention under the “Three-Level Prevention Model”[J]. Education Science, 2022, 38(2): 90-96.

参考文献 20

[1]	姚应水. 预防医学[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2017:15-16.
[2]	傅宏. 从三级预防保健的理念看儿童青少年心理健康教育[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2001(4):55-59.
[3]	崔秀兰. 二战后英国卓越教师政策发展研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨师范大学, 2019.
[4]	王凯, 张文华. 英国基础教育教师评价制度改革评鉴[J]. 外国教育研究, 2006(12):68-72.
[5]	Department for Education. School teachers’ pay and conditions[EB/OL].(2021-10-01) [2021-12-23]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-teachers-pay-and-conditions.
[6]	CAMPBELL E. Connecting the ethics of teaching and moral education[J]. Journal of teacher education, 1997, 48(4):255-263. doi: 10.1177/0022487197048004003
[7]	[8] WALTERS S, HEILBRONN R, DALY C. Ethics education in initial teacher education:pre-service provision in England[J]. Professional development in education, 2018, 44(3):385-396. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2017.1318773
[9]	Teaching Regulation Agency. Teacher misconduct: information for teachers[EB/OL].(2022-01-28) [2022-02-25]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teacher-misconduct-information-for-teachers.
[10]	李欣蕾, 桑国元. 英国教师专业伦理行为监管机制概况及其启示[J]. 中小学德育, 2020(1):13-15.
[11]	Department for Education. Keeping children safe in education[EB/OL].(2021-09-01) [2021-12-05]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education-2.
[12]	刘昊, 余海婴. 英国基础教育督导的挑战、应对及问题[J]. 世界教育信息, 2018(23):63-66.
[13]	贺卫. 寻租经济学[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 1999:7.
[14]	切萨雷·贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑法[M].黄风,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1993:59.
[15]	Teaching Regulation Agency. Teacher misconduct: the prohibition of teachers[EB/OL]. (2022-02-01) [2022-03-08]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teacher-misconduct-the-prohibition-of-teachers-3.
[16]	Teaching Regulating Agency. Teacher misconduct: regulating the teaching profession[EB/OL].(2018-09-03) [2022-02-25]. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/teacher-misconduct-regulating-the-teaching-profession.
[17]	杨俊一. 价值正义: 国家社会治理的原则、原理与路径--兼论“核心价值观”规范国家社会治理的伦理路径[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(1):1-18.
[18]	JOPLIN L, BOGUE B, CAMPBELL N, et al. Using an integrated model to implement evidence-based practices in corrections[R]. Boston: Crime and Justice Institute, 2004.
[19]	任海宾. 师德规范:源自内心的标准[J]. 教育科学研究, 2016(3):12-15.
[20]	邱琳. 人的存在与价值教育[J]. 教育研究, 2012(5):42-47.

“三级预防”模式下英国教师专业伦理失范预防的策略及启示^*

Strategies and Implications of British Teachers’ Professional Ethical Misconduct Prevention under the “Three-Level Prevention Model”

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	闫建璋, 王颖. 教师教学情感的类型、问题与调适策略^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(2): 74-80.
[2]	秦乐琦, 程超. 征询式课堂回音意义建构的机制与过程^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(2): 60-66.
[3]	宋乃庆, 吴乐乐. 区县教研员领导力的内涵、构成要素与提升策略^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(3): 8-14.
[4]	刘争先, 赵萌, 杨岚. 小学生社会情感能力影响学业成绩的机制及教育启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(4): 29-35.
[5]	白弘雅, 周正. 学生积极心态的内涵、重要价值与培养策略^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(3): 46-51.
[6]	姜艳, 李如密. 教学想象的审美阐释及提升策略^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(1): 22-28.
[7]	苏启敏, 陶燕琴. 美国教师专业道德守则的演进轨迹、理论旨趣与政策启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(2): 91-96.
[8]	周兆海, 邬志辉. 教师激励的理念转向与策略优化^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(1): 63-67.
[9]	王晓华. 中国四省市学校科学表现、影响因素及启示——基于PISA2015中国四省市数据[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(1): 23-31.