教育科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 68-77.

• 高等教育研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于元评价视角的高校人文社科成果评价研究*——以国社科成果评价为例

马永霞, 仇笳熙, 葛于壮   

  1. 北京理工大学 人文与社会科学学院,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-07 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2022-01-27
  • 作者简介:马永霞(1963- ),女,辽宁沈阳人,北京理工大学人文与社会科学学院教授,主要从事就业与创新教育、科研评价研究;|仇笳熙(1985- ),女,云南昆明人,北京理工大学人文与社会科学学院博士生,主要从事科研评价研究;|葛于壮(1994- ),男,山东菏泽人,北京理工大学人文与社会科学学院博士生,主要从事学术治理、科研评价研究。
  • 基金资助:
    *教育部人文社科规划项目“双一流背景下社会科学成果评价体系研究”(18YJA880062)

Research on the Achievement Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of Meta-Evaluation——Taking the Achievement Evaluation of NSSFC as an Example

Ma Yongxia, Qiu Jiaxi, Ge Yuzhuang   

  1. School of Humanities And Social Sciences,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Online:2021-11-15 Published:2022-01-27

RichHTML

18

PDF

365

摘要：

高校人文社科成果评价是对高校人文社科类教师科研成果产出质量和水平进行全面考察与评判的标准,旨在以评价为抓手促进成果“熟化”,挖掘具有创造性、先进性、权威性的人文社科成果。人文社科成果评价对整体学科发展及教师科研活动的开展具有重要的导向作用,不仅能为高校“一流”人文社会学科的建设与发展提供参考,亦能进一步提升高校教师学术创新及科研育人的质量,是完善高等教育评价体系改革建设的关键举措。然而,由于人文社科成果与自然科学成果相比更具隐性特质,短时间内难以呈现出成果价值,在其评价体系上存在较大的争议和局限。基于此,本研究以教育学经典的元评价理论为视角,选取人文社科领域极具代表性与示范性的国家社科基金项目成果鉴定评价(简称“国社科成果评价”)作为案例,通过定量分析与专家访谈相结合,对其开展基于“四维度、六要素”的元评价分析,找寻既有评价的现存问题及偏差点,提出针对我国高校人文社科成果评价体系的改进建议。

关键词: 高校, 人文社科, 成果评价, 元评价

Abstract:

The achievement evaluation of humanities and social sciences in colleges and universities is a standard for comprehensively examining and judging the quality and level of scientific research achievements of humanities and social sciences teachers in colleges and universities. The purpose is to promote the “maturation” of the results with evaluation as the starting point, and to explore the creative, advanced and authoritative humanities and social science achievements. Achievement evaluation of humanities and social sciences plays an important dual role in discipline and teachers, which can not only point out the direction of the discipline construction of “first-class” humanities and social sciences in colleges and universities,but also further improve the quality of academic innovation and scientific research education of colleges and universities teachers. It is a key measure to improve the reform and construction of higher education evaluation system. However, because the achievements of humanities and social sciences are more recessive than those of natural sciences, it is difficult to show the value of achievements in a short period of time, and there are great controversies and limitations in their evaluation system. Based on this,this study takes the classic meta-evaluation theory of pedagogy as a perspective, and selects the very representative project achievement evaluation of National Social Science Fund of China (NSSFC) as a case. Through the combination of quantitative analysis and expert interviews, this study carried out a meta-evaluation analysis based on “four dimensions and six elements” to find out the existing problems and deviations of existing evaluations, and put forward suggestions for improving the evaluation system of humanities and social sciences achievements in Chinese universities.

Key words: colleges and universities, humanities and social sciences, achievement evaluation, meta-evaluation

中图分类号: