论师德情怀:内涵、意义与构成要素*

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

师德情怀是新时代我国教师需要具备的基本素养,但学界对它的内涵、意义和构成要素却不甚明确。师德情怀可以被理解为教师为人师表的道德自觉和追求卓越的理想情怀。它由“职业道德”与“教育情怀”两个独立的素养组成。“职业道德”是指教师个人内在具有的一类与教学密切相关的良好道德品质,包括尊重学生、对学生负责、以公正的方式对待学生、关爱学生。“教育情怀”是指教师树立的有关教学的理想信念,包括相信每个孩子都能成功;认同教师工作的专业性;恪尽师道,做学生的道德示范者;恪尽职守,做社会的角色楷模。师德情怀具有三重意义:它是教师开展育人工作不可或缺的素养;它能为教师专业化奠定伦理基石,教师职业若想受人尊重,教师就需要对公众负责;它能为教师胜任教学这项复杂而充满不确定性的工作注入动力。

关键词: 教师素养, 教师专业化, 师德, 教育情怀

Abstract:

The sentiment of teacher ethics is a basic quality that teachers in China need to possess in the new era, but the academic community is not very clear about its connotation, significance, and constituent elements. Teachers’ ethical sentiment can be understood as teachers’ ethical consciousness and ideal sentiment of pursuing excellence. It is composed of two independent qualities: “professional ethics” and “educational sentiment”. “Professional ethics” refers to qualities teachers have that are closely related to teaching, including respecting students, being responsible for students, treating students in a fair way, and caring for students. “Educational sentiment” refers to the ideals and beliefs about teaching established by teachers, including believing that every child can succeed, recognizing the professionalism of teachers’ work, fulfilling their duties as teachers, being moral role models for students, fulfilling their duties, and being role models for society. Teachers’ ethical sentiment demonstrates a threefold significance: it is indispensable for teachers to carry out their work of educating people; it is the cornerstone of teachers’ professionalism, and teachers need to be accountable to the public if the teaching profession is to be respected; and it provides motivation for teachers to be competent in teaching, a job that is complex and full of uncertainty.

Key words: teacher competence, teacher professionalization, teacher professional ethics, educational sentiment

中图分类号:

吴宗劲, 王静. 论师德情怀:内涵、意义与构成要素^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 10-16.

Wu Zongjin, Wang Jing. On the Sentiment of Teacher Ethics: Connotation, Significance, and Constituent Elements[J]. Education Science, 2024, 40(3): 10-16.

参考文献 50

[1]	常亚慧, 李永康. 在“师者”与“匠人”之间:教师专业化的历史社会学反思[J]. 教育科学, 2014(2):43-47.
[2]	MARTIN C. On the educational value of philosophical ethics for teacher education: the practice of ethical inquiry as liberal education[J]. Curriculum inquiry, 2013, 43(2):189-209.
[3]	WILKINSON G. Civic professionalism: teacher education and professional ideals and values in a commercialized education world[J]. Journal of education for teaching, 2007, 33(3):379-395.
[4]	张丽敏. 教师使命的内涵及特征探讨[J]. 教师教育研究, 2012(6):7-12.
[5]	[6] MADERO C. A calling to teach:what the literature on callings tells us about approaches to research the calling to the teaching profession[J]. Religion & education, 2020, 47(2):170-187.
[7]	[13][16] HANSEN D T. The call to teach[M]. New York: Teachers College Press,1995:114,9,131.
[8]	饶从满. 教师专业标准何为?——教师专业标准思想背景与目的取向的比较透视[J]. 外国教育研究, 2022(1):3-16.
[9]	李泽厚. 伦理学新说[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2021:74.
[10]	CHEETHAM G, CHIVERS G. Towards a holistic model of professional competence[J]. Journal of european industrial training, 1996, 20(5):20-30.
[11]	饶从满, 吴琼, 李晓. 新时代中国教师素养模型的理论建构[J]. 教师教育研究, 2024(1):8-15.
[12]	OECD. The future of education and skills education 2030[M]. Paris:OECD,2018:4-6.
[14]	HANSEN D T. Teaching as a moral activity[M]//RICHARDSON V, et al. Handbook of research on teaching.4th ed. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association,2001:826-857.
[15]	FENSTERMACHER G D. On the concept of manner and its visibility in teaching practice[J]. Journal of curriculum studies, 2001, 33(6):639-653.
[17]	[20] 赵康. 专业、专业属性及判断成熟专业的六条标准:一个社会学角度的分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2000(5):30-39.
[18]	张贵新. 对教师专业化的理念、现实与未来的探讨[J]. 外国教育研究, 2002(2):50-55.
[19]	罗杰·索德. 论教师职业专业化[M]//约翰·I. 古德莱德, 肯尼思·A. 斯罗特尼克. 教学的道德尺度. 汪菊, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2012:30-74.
[21]	[22] GUSTAFSON J M. Professions as “callings”[J]. Social service review, 1982, 56(4):501-515.
[23]	BECKER H S, et al. The nature of a profession[M]//NELSON H B, et al. Education for the professions, sixty-first yearbook of the national society for the study of education(Part Ⅱ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962:26-46.
[24]	[26] LABAREE D F. On the nature of teaching and teacher education[J]. Journal of teacher education, 2000, 51(3):228-233.
[25]	COHEN D K, RAUDENBUSH S W, BALL D L. Resources, instruction, and research[J]. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 2003, 25(2):119-142.
[27]	KENNEDY M M. Knowledge and vision in teaching[J]. Journal of teacher education, 2006, 57(3):205-211.
[28]	姜添辉. 论教师专业意识、社会控制与保守文化[J]. 教育与社会研究, 2000, 1(12):1-24.
[29]	[43][44] DAY C. A Passion for teaching[M]. London & New York: Routledge Falmer, 2004: 11,21,22.
[30]	EMMET D. Function, purpose, and powers[M]. London: Macmillan, 1958:255.
[31]	HANSEN D T. Teaching and the sense of vocation[J]. Educational theory, 1994, 44(3):259-275.
[32]	SMITH L P. All trivia[M]. New York: Harcourt, Brace 8c Company, 1934:134.
[33]	刘幸, 陈玺. 杜威的缺位与陶行知师德形象的确立[J]. 南京晓庄学院学报, 2022, 38(3):1-4.
[34]	[35][38] LICKONA T. Educating for character: how our schools can teach respect and responsibility[M]. New York: Bantam, 1992: 38,49,43.
[36]	沈辉香, 何齐宗. 正义与关怀: 教师道德价值取向的诠释[J]. 高等教育研究, 2019(4):56-59.
[37]	DILLON R S. Respect[EB/OL].(2022-07-02)[2023-11-30]. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/respect/#ElemResp.
[39]	李敏, 檀传宝. 师德崇高性与底线师德[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2008(6):74-78.
[40]	鲍传友. 课堂教学不公平现象初探[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2001(10):45-48.
[41]	董波. 德性与平等:论亚里士多德最佳政体的性质[J]. 世界哲学, 2017(4):102-108.
[42]	GHIATAU R M, BRANCH R A I. Ethical competence for teachers: a possible model[J]. Symposion, 2015, 2(3):387-403.
[45]	YIN H, LEE J C K. Be passionate, but be rational as well: emotional rules for Chinese teachers’ work[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2012(28):56-65.
[46]	ISENBARGER L, ZEMBYLAS M. The emotional labour of caring in teaching[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2005, 22(1):120-134.
[47]	HOYLE E. The professionalization of teachers: a paradox[J]. British journal of educational studies, 1982, 30(2):161-171.
[48]	HANSEN D T. Reimagining the call to teach: a witness to teachers and teaching[M]. New York: Teachers College Press,2021:120.
[49]	施克灿. 中国古代教育家理想中的教师标准探究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2006(1):60-65.
[50]	SOCKETT H. The moral base for teacher professionalism[M]. New York: Teachers College Press, 1993: 8.

论师德情怀:内涵、意义与构成要素^*

On the Sentiment of Teacher Ethics: Connotation, Significance, and Constituent Elements

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 50

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘万海, 李倩. 在地化视角下乡村教师教育情怀的生成机理与现实路径^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 75-81.
[2]	吴琼, 李晓. 新时代中国教师应具备什么样的素养?^*——基于教师视角的“新时代中国教师素养模型”的调查验证[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 24-30.
[3]	苗学杰. 教师“全人教育”素养:内涵、价值与构成^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 17-23.
[4]	饶从满, 王玥. 关于新时代中国教师素养模型建构的前提性思考^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 1-9.
[5]	周成海. 品性取向教师教育之分析^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(5): 67-74.
[6]	闫建璋. 新时代师德修养的三重境界^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(1): 17-22.
[7]	刘刚, 丁三青. 大学卓越教师教学学术核心能力的圈层结构及其特征^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(6): 53-60.