教育循证:内涵、理念、特征及实施*

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

教育循证已经成为一种新型的教育研究范式,其本体论内涵是什么、理念主张是什么、方法论有何特征以及实施有何取向等问题亟待研究。在内涵方面,教育循证以教育实践与教育规律、理论、政策的一致性为研究对象,借助科学完备的证据缩短教育规律、理论、政策与教育实践之间的距离,并在其间发挥动态调节、改进与完善的功能。从理念而言,教育循证的理念主张,体现着教育学研究对证实过程、证据与理性事实的关注。教育循证的有效性体现在对证据的多重优化上,其系统性来自实施的理性协同,其一致性则源于对事实理性判断的回归。在实施中,从诊断教育实践问题的角度来说,教育循证可作为一种技术;从改进教育理论的角度来说,教育循证可作为一种方法;从制定教育政策的角度来说,教育循证可作为一种路径。

关键词: 教育循证, 教育决策, 教育政策, 循证, 证据

Abstract:

Evidence-based education has become a new educational research paradigm, and issues such as its ontological connotation, conceptual propositions, methodological characteristics, and implementation orientation need to be studied urgently. In terms of connotation, evidence-based education takes the consistency between educational practice and educational laws, theories, and policies as the research object, and uses scientific complete evidence to shorten the distance between educational laws, theories, policies, and practices, and plays the function of dynamic adjustment, improvement and optimization during the process. From a conceptual perspective, the idea of evidence-based education embodies the focus of educational research on the verification process, evidence, and rational facts. The effectiveness of evidence-based education is reflected in the multiple optimizations of evidence, its systematization comes from the rational coordination of implementation, and its consistency comes from the regression of rational judgment of facts. In implementation, from the perspective of diagnosing educational practice problems, evidence-based education can be used as a technology; from the perspective of improving educational theory, evidence-based education can be used as a method; from the perspective of formulating educational policies, evidence-based education can serve as a path.

Key words: evidence-based education, educational decision, educational policy, evidence-based, evidence

中图分类号:

王光明, 甄祎明, 刘静. 教育循证:内涵、理念、特征及实施^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(6): 17-23.

Wang Guangming, Zhen Yiming, Liu Jing. Evidence-Based Education: Connotation, Concept, Characteristics, and Implementation[J]. Education Science, 2023, 39(6): 17-23.

参考文献 46

[1]	AL-HABIL W I. Positivist and phenomenological research in public administration[J]. Arab journal of administration, 2014, 34(1):321-331.
[2]	PHILLIPS D C. A guide for the perplexed:scientific educational research,methodolatry,and the gold versus platinum standards[J]. Educational research review, 2006(1):15-26.
[3]	GUYATT G, CAIRNS J, CHURCHILL D, et al. Evidence-based medicine:a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine[J]. JAMA the journal of the american medical association, 1992, 268(17):2420-2425. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
[4]	SACKETT D L, ROSENBERG W M C, GRAY J A M, et al. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t[J]. BMJ, 1996, 312(7023):71-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
[5]	GUYATT G, RENNIE D. Users guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice[M]. Chicago: AMA Press, 2002:3-12.
[6]	ATKINSON E. In defence of ideas, or why ‘what works’ is not enough[J]. British journal of sociology of education, 2000, 21(3):317-330. doi: 10.1080/713655359
[7]	潘岳林, 荀渊. 美国AAQEP循证教师教育认证的实践路径与启示[J]. 教师教育研究, 2023, 35(5):122-128.
[8]	宋萑, 徐淼. 教师教育者循证实践与教师教育证据迭代[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(3):1-8.
[9]	郑红苹, 崔友兴. “互联网+教育”下循证教学的理念与路径[J]. 教育研究, 2018, 39(8):101-107.
[10]	杨文登. 循证实践:一种新的实践形态?[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2010, 26(4):106-110.
[11]	DAVIES P. What is evidence-based education?[J]. British journal of educational studies, 1999, 47(2):108-121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106
[12]	威廉·詹姆士. 实用主义:某些旧思想方法的新名称[M]. 李步楼,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012:26-27.
[13]	李华, 程晋宽. 循证学校改革:美国基础教育改革路径探索[J]. 教育研究, 2019, 40(10):62-73.
[14]	姚计海. 教育实证研究方法的范式问题与反思[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(3):64-71.
[15]	李华. 美国循证支持的校长效能评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2021:79.
[16]	HARGREAVES D H. In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley[J]. British educational research journal, 1997, 23(4):405-419. doi: 10.1080/0141192970230402
[17]	商务国际辞书编辑部. 现代汉语词典[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆国际有限公司, 2017:1673.
[18]	Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary[M]. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013:6059.
[19]	LEHMAN J S, PHELPS S. West’ s encyclopedia of American law[M]. 2nd ed. Michigan: Gale Group, 2004:247.
[20]	SLAVIN R E. How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education[J]. Educational psychologist, 2020, 55(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432
[21]	苏国勋. 理性化及其限制[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1988:89.
[22]	马克斯·韦伯. 社会科学方法论[M]. 韩水法,莫茜,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013:162.
[23]	埃德加·莫兰. 复杂性理论与教育问题[M]. 陈一壮,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004:2.
[24]	张琦. 遵循循证原则制订教育政策[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2007(7):11-15.
[25]	张端鸿, 蔡三发. 循证决策在高校学科规划中的应用:以A大学新一轮学科建设方案决策为例[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2014, 12(4):21-28.
[26]	BANKS G. Evidence-based policy-making:what is it?How do we get it?[J]. Social science electronic publishing, 2009(20):1-27.
[27]	SANDERSON I. Making sense of ‘what works’: evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality?[J]. Public policy and administration, 2002, 17(3):61-75. doi: 10.1177/095207670201700305
[28]	喻佳洁, 李琰, 陈雯雯, 等. 从循证医学到循证科学的必然趋势[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(1):119-124.
[29]	杨文登, 叶浩生. 缩短教育理论与实践的距离:基于循证教育学的视野[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2010(3):11-17.
[30]	HAYNES R B. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions[J]. BMJ evidence-based medicine, 2006(11):162-164.
[31]	赵中夫, 姚应水. 循证医学[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2013:21.
[32]	任萍萍, 李鑫. 循证教育研究:缘起、困境、体系框架与实施建议[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(12):33-39.
[33]	SMITH V, DEVANE D, BEGLEY C M, et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions[J]. BMC medical research methodology, 2011, 11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 pmid: 21291558
[34]	刘海霞, 胡德华, 尹怀琼. 伞形评价:一种新型循证医学分析方法[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(2):261-266.
[35]	孙重阳, 张浩然, 刘晓玉, 等. 伞形综述:选择与应用最佳综合证据的循证实践[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(5):609-614.
[36]	刘福森. 从实践唯物主义到历史唯物主义[J]. 理论探讨, 2001(6):20-24.
[37]	BIESTA G J J. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: from evidence-based education to value-based education[J]. Studies in philosophy and education, 2010(29):491-503.
[38]	伍春兰. 中学数学“卓越教师”培养的循证实践:以教学主张提炼为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2022, 31(4):38-43.
[39]	宋维玉, 李晓华. 循证教育理念下师范生实践课程改革研究:以“小学全科教师培养项目”实训课程为个案[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(3):15-22.
[40]	朱旭东, 付钰, 靳伟, 等. 循证理念下教师教育研究对教师教育政策制定的影响研究[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2022(12):40-44.
[41]	深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案[EB/OL]. (2020-10-13)[2022-09-30]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202010/t20201013_494381.html.
[42]	Coalition for Evidence-based Education. a picture of evidence-based education[EB/OL]. (2023-06-13)[2023-09-04]. https://cebenetwork.org/picture-evidence-based-education.
[43]	Quality Assurance Agency. The frameworks for HE qualifications of UK degree-awarding bodies[EB/OL]. (2014-11-03) [2023-07-16]. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qualifications-frameworks.pdf?sfvrsn=170af781_18.
[44]	The Ministry of Education. Iterative best evidence synthesis programme[EB/OL]. (2012-12-13) [2022-10-26]. http://dev.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/109739/BES-FindingsOverview-A3-Dec-2012.pdf.
[45]	王光明, 甄祎明, 刘静. 教师核心素养和能力的实践样态:基于对4 661名教师的循证研究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2022, 34(5):23-32.
[46]	孟祥红, 齐恬雨, 张丹. 从课程支撑到能力整合:工程教育专业认证“毕业要求”指标研究[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2021, 190(5):64-70.

教育循证:内涵、理念、特征及实施^*

Evidence-Based Education: Connotation, Concept, Characteristics, and Implementation

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙丽华. 数字化视域下幼儿教师评价素养:发展判断与优化路向^*[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(3): 90-96.
[2]	王建梁, 杨阳. 印度中小学教育改革的方案、旨趣与挑战^*——基于印度《国家教育政策(2020)实施计划》的解读[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(1): 69-75.
[3]	徐赟. 政策网络视角下民办学校分类管理政策执行的困局与破局^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(5): 83-90.
[4]	曲建武, 黄磊. 中国共产党劳动教育政策的演变及启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(5): 1-7.
[5]	宋萑, 徐淼. 教师教育者循证实践与教师教育证据迭代^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(3): 8-14.
[6]	宋维玉, 李晓华. 循证教育理念下师范生实践课程改革研究^*——以“小学全科教师培养项目”实训课程为个案[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(3): 15-22.
[7]	朱旭东, 赵英, 武尚文. 教师教育认证的循证逻辑^*——基于CAEP2018版认证标准的分析[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(3): 1-7.
[8]	王美, 曲铁华. 我国高等教育政策的历史演进、现实困境与疏解策略^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(2): 69-74.
[9]	刘源, 张志勇. 我国幼小衔接政策的历史演进与展望^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(1): 83-89.
[10]	黄明东, 黄炳超, 刘婷. 租购同权:缓解义务教育供给侧矛盾的“药方”^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(1): 38-45.
[11]	姚佳胜, 方媛. 政策工具视角下我国流动儿童教育政策的量化分析^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(6): 85-93.
[12]	祁占勇, 李阳. 结构二重性视角下教育政策执行的影响因素及模式^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(6): 69-76.
[13]	乌云特娜, 金童林. 中国特色民族教育智库建设:特质、责任及实践路径^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(5): 78-83.
[14]	孙艺格, 曲建武. 我国家庭教育政策的演变、特征及展望^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(3): 91-96.
[15]	张冰, 程天君. 新中国成立以来学生“减负”历程的回顾与反思 ^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(6): 33-39.