美国教师专业道德守则的演进轨迹、理论旨趣与政策启示*

教育科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 91-96.

• 外国教育研究 • 上一篇

美国教师专业道德守则的演进轨迹、理论旨趣与政策启示^*

苏启敏, 陶燕琴

广州大学教育学院,广东广州 510006

收稿日期:2019-02-26 出版日期:2019-03-15 发布日期:2021-06-30
作者简介:苏启敏(1980- ),男,广东广州人,广州大学教育学院副教授,研究方向:教育哲学与教师教育;|陶燕琴(1995- ),女,广东梅州人,广州大学教育学院硕士研究生,研究方向:教师教育。
基金资助:
*本文系广东省哲学社会科学规划项目研究成果之一(GD17CJY06)

American Teachers Professional Ethics Codes: Development track, theoretical orientations and policy inspirations

Su Qimin, Tao Yanqin

School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2019-02-26 Online:2019-03-15 Published:2021-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

美国教师专业道德守则分别由教育专业组织和教育行政部门制定。前者经历乔治亚州教师协会守则的“领先”、全国教育协会道德守则的“探索”和教育者道德模范守则的“出台”。后者先后遭遇专业“道德潮”和教育道德“大挑战”。这些守则以后果论、道义论及德性论等道德哲学作为理论依据,同时为我国师德规范相关政策改进带来四点启示:建立教师专业道德委员会、明确师德规范的理论依据、完善支撑师德规范的法律体系、迎接教育信息技术变革的挑战。

关键词: 美国, 教师专业道德守则, 演进轨迹, 理论旨趣, 政策启示

Abstract:

Professional organizations and departments of education contribute to American teachers professional ethics codes. The former experienced Georgia State Teachers Association code, National Education Association code and Model Code of Educator Ethics. The latter met the ethics boom of professions and ethical challenge of education. Consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics are bases of codes. And policy inspirations are as follows: establishing committees on professional ethics; improving theoretical bases and legal system for teachers professional ethics codes; facing new challenges of information technology in education.

Key words: the U.S., teachers professional ethics codes, development track, theoretical orientations, policy inspirations

中图分类号:

G515.1

苏启敏, 陶燕琴. 美国教师专业道德守则的演进轨迹、理论旨趣与政策启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(2): 91-96.

Su Qimin, Tao Yanqin. American Teachers Professional Ethics Codes: Development track, theoretical orientations and policy inspirations[J]. Education Science, 2019, 35(2): 91-96.

参考文献 17

[1]	Dungeon, R.B., Cooke, Harper, & Harper, C.A. Code of Ethics for Teachers[J]. Journal of Education, 1893,38(4):77-78.
[2]	[4] Reeder W. G. A Code of Ethics[J]. Educational Research Bulletin, 1931,10(1):12-19.
[3]	Reeder W. G. Ethics of the Teaching Profession[J]. Review of Educational Research, 1931,1(2):108-110.
[5]	Perry, C.C. A Code of Ethics for Public School Teachers[J]. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1955,297(1):76-82. doi: 10.1177/000271625529700110
[6]	National Education Association. Code of Ethics of the Education Profession[EB/OL].(2019-01-05)[2019-01-26] http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/Code_of_Ethics_NEA_Handbook_2018.pdf.
[7]	[18] National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. Model Code of Ethics for Educators[EB/OL].(2017-11-02)[2018-12-05] https://www.nasdtec.net/page/MCEE_DOCS.
[8]	[19] New Hampshire State Board of Education. Guiding Principles:The Code of Ethics for New Hampshire Educators[EB/OL]. (2018-06-13)[2018-07-22]https://www.education.nh.gov/certification/documents/code_ethics.pdf.
[9]	HomesR. J. S. M., Wamser, R. J., Zahm-Duncheon, A. D. Codes of educator ethics in the United States:A policy analysis to guide leadership at the national, state, and local levels[D]. Saint Louis:Saint Louis University, 2014: 23.
[10]	[11] Kaufman, W. R. P. Honor and Revenge:A Theory of Punishment[M]. New York:Springer, 2013: 24、25.
[12]	New York State Education Department. New York State Code of Ethics for Educators[EB/OL].(2017-07-17)[2018-06-18] http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/pdf/codeofethics.pdf.
[13]	[16] Association of American Educators. AAE Code of Ethics for Educators[EB/OL]. (2016-06-03)[2018-06-05] https://www.aaeteachers.org/images/pdfs/aaecodeofethicsforeducators.pdf.
[14]	Alaska Professional Teaching Practices Commission. Code of Ethics of the Education Profession[EB/OL].(2018-08-02)[2018-09-21]https://education.alaska.gov/ptpc/pdf/Code-of-ethics-fullpage.pdf.
[15]	[美] 麦金太尔. 追寻美德:道德理论研究[M].宋继杰,译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2008: 215.
[17]	Bell, M.S., Hinds Jr, E., Calhoun, M.A., et al. Symposium Group II. Topic:A Beginner Considers the Ethics and Ideals of the Profession of Teaching[J]. Peabody Journal of Education, 1941,19(2):68-74. doi: 10.1080/01619564109535686

美国教师专业道德守则的演进轨迹、理论旨趣与政策启示^*

American Teachers Professional Ethics Codes: Development track, theoretical orientations and policy inspirations

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 17

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高玲, 曹春平. 论美国科学教育的发展及其逻辑^*[J]. 教育科学, 2023, 39(3): 15-22.
[2]	王阳, 唐汉卫. 拉格的社会科课程思想:背景、内容及其特点^*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(6): 36-43.
[3]	张斌贤, 季楚潇. 青春期“发现”与19—20世纪之交美国教育改革*[J]. 教育科学, 2022, 38(1): 1-9.
[4]	闫晓萍, 何云峰. 美国中小学财经课程的结构特征、保障机制及启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(5): 80-87.
[5]	赵振红, 于兰. 如何使教师卓越?美国的经验与启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2021, 37(5): 64-71.
[6]	肖凤翔, 张荣. 美国教育软实力提升的路径选择及启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2020, 36(3): 70-75.
[7]	孔令帅, 张佳. 美国特许学校授权机构的职责、类型与监督措施 ^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(6): 86-93.
[8]	王凤玉, 都本伟. 第二次世界大战前美国一流大学群体崛起的原因及其启示^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(3): 61-66.
[9]	王丹艺, 于泽元. 美国基础教育课程改革中的权力博弈:学术、国家及市场的三角关系^*[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(2): 84-90.
[10]	陈时见, 王远. 美国公立中小学教师短缺的基本现状与改进策略[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(2): 78-83.
[11]	王晓华. 中国四省市学校科学表现、影响因素及启示——基于PISA2015中国四省市数据[J]. 教育科学, 2019, 35(1): 23-31.